That unprovable theory still is the love of many astrophysicists...
What is there to love?
It begins at a single point in theory
Then in theory becomes expanding galaxies moving away from this point.
I am not poking fun here. But read the lines above.
Do they not point at an invisible point? A great explosion? Powerful motion unleashed...how it all began this way.
It all began with a bang
A powerful explosion
Explosion creates everything
Fate of an explosion
Result of an explosion
The reason for everthing is an explosion
Creation of universe is linguistically equal to "Explosion"
Or things have violent origins
We agree this is infered
Why the hard stance on this?
Especially now that this can not be proved?
What is there to love?
It begins at a single point in theory
Then in theory becomes expanding galaxies moving away from this point.
I am not poking fun here. But read the lines above.
Do they not point at an invisible point? A great explosion? Powerful motion unleashed...how it all began this way.
It all began with a bang
A powerful explosion
Explosion creates everything
Fate of an explosion
Result of an explosion
The reason for everthing is an explosion
Creation of universe is linguistically equal to "Explosion"
Or things have violent origins
We agree this is infered
Why the hard stance on this?
Especially now that this can not be proved?
Comments
Post a Comment